MESOSCALE
NUMERICAL MODELING SIMULATIONS
In
this study we will utilize the Colorado State University Regional Atmospheric
Modeling System (CSU RAMS) for multiple purposes. The
RAMS will be used to verify if differences in land use are indeed
responsible for some of the observed differences in cloudiness,
to understand the land use climate interaction processes, and also
evaluate the overall impact of land use on the hydrology of this
region. The RAMS version 4.4 model is nonhydrostatic and
is used for the simulation of atmospheric phenomenon ranging from
cloud scale to mesoscale (Pielke et. al., 1992). The RAMS
has been used successfully to simulate several atmospheric processes
such as sea breezes, downslope winds, air pollution, and atmospheric
convection ranging from boundary layer cumulus to mesoscale convective
systems (Pielke, 2002). We have used RAMS to study flash
floods (Nair et al., 1997), impact of land use on cloud formation
(Nair et al., 2002) and orographic cloud formation (Nair et al,
1997; Lawton et al., 2001).
The RAMS uses finite difference methods for solving the various
conservation equations governing the atmospheric flow on a polar
stereographic grid in the horizontal and a terrain following sigma-z
coordinate system in the vertical. Atmospheric processes
are represented in the RAMS using schemes of varying complexity. It
provides flexibility for choosing the level of sophistication used
for representing processes such as turbulence, cloud microphysics,
radiative transfer and other processes. The RAMS provides several
techniques to handle the top and lateral boundary conditions. Observational
data and analysis from larger domain models can be assimilated
into the model using a nudging scheme.
One of the strengths of RAMS, which is of crucial importance to
this study, is the sophisticated Land Ecosystem Atmosphere Feedback
(LEAF-2) model used to represent the land surface processes. The
LEAF-2 accounts for the energy and moisture transfers between atmosphere
and soil, water, snow and vegetation and allows for specification
of multiple types of land use at individual grid points. At
the surface, the RAMS uses a 30 second resolution global database
to specify the land use type and topography. However, RAMS
also allows the user to specify realistic land use characteristics
derived from other sources such as satellite data.
Cloud and precipitation processes can be represented in the RAMS
through either implicit convective parameterization schemes or
explicit representation of cloud microphysics. Two different
types of convective parameterization schemes used by the RAMS include
the modified Kuo scheme (Tremback, 1990) and the Kain-Fritsch scheme
(Kain and Fritsch, 1993). Explicit representation of cloud
microphysics (Walko et al, 1995; Meyers et al., 1997; Saleeby and
Cotton, 2003) allows for prediction of mixing ratio and number
concentration of two categories of cloud droplets, pristine ice,
rain, snow, aggregates, graupel and hail and user specified concentrations
of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and giant cloud condensation
nuclei (GCCN).
The RAMS provide radiative transfer schemes of varying sophistication,
from a scheme that accounts only for clear air radiative transfer
to a two stream technique that accounts for the ice particle shape. However,
currently none of these schemes account for the radiative interactions
of atmospheric aerosols. We have recently integrated a modified
version of the sophisticated Fu-Liou radiative transfer scheme
(Christopher et al., 2002) into RAMS that accounts for aerosol
interactions. Implementation of the Fu-Liou scheme is an
important addition to the RAMS since it will provide accurate estimates
of downwelling solar flux at the surface under both clear and aerosol
loaded atmospheric conditions, which is a crucial input for the
land surface model.
The RAMS will be utilized for three sets of numerical modeling
experiments. We will use RAMS configured with relatively
less sophisticated convective parameterization but computationally
inexpensive simulations to examine the influence of land use on
regional climate at an annual time scale. Sophisticated but
computationally more expensive simulations will be used to examine
impacts of land use on convective cloud formation at smaller time
scales. In the first set of simulations RAMS will be configured
for coarse grid spacing (>= 10km) regional climate simulations
spanning a time period of 1 year. The second set of simulations
with medium grid spacing (<= 3 km) will examine cloud formation
over limited domain in the bunny fence area during the months of
August and December of 2004. The third set of simulations
involves specific case studies simulating cloud formation over
the bunny fence region for time scales of a day and grid spacing
ranging from 1km to 100m. These simulations will be used
mainly to verify if land use is responsible for some of the observed
differences in cloud formation.
<--top
Long-term
coarse spatial resolution simulations will be used to examine
differences in regional thermodynamic profiles, circulation and
precipitation patterns resulting from human induced land use
changes. We will utilize two RAMS regional climate simulations
(RC1, RC2) spanning a time period of 1 year for this purpose. The
configuration of the nested grid to be used is given in Table 1
while locations are shown in Figure 10. Both simulations
will start with identical atmospheric conditions and have the same
forcing along the lateral and top boundaries. However, in
one simulation current land use patterns are to be specified (RC1)
while pristine distribution of vegetation is to be used in the
other (RC2). Radiosonde and surface observations along with
the NCEP reanalysis data will be used to specify the initial atmospheric
conditions and lateral boundary forcing. In the long-term
regional climate simulations, we will not use an explicit representation
of clouds. We will use Kain-Fritsch cumulus parameterization
scheme which is appropriate at the grid spacing used in these simulations.
 |
Figure
10. Locations of various
grids used in the numerical modeling experiments. |
To
properly simulate the effects of land surface heterogeneity on
regional climate, a realistic representation of surface vegetation
characteristics and their seasonal variation are needed. We
will use the MODIS derived vegetation characteristics for this
purpose. Two of the important vegetation characteristics
used in the LEAF-2 soil vegetation model within RAMS are Leaf
Area Index (LAI) and fractional vegetation cover. The MODIS-derived
LAI product at 1 km resolution is available at both one-and eight-day
intervals. We will use the eight-day interval LAI product
to specify seasonal variation of this vegetation characteristic
within RAMS. Fractional vegetation cover is currently not
a standard MODIS product. However, we plan to use NDVI
derived from MODIS to specify fractional vegetation cover in
RAMS. We will use the technique outlined in section 5.2
for this purpose. The MODIS-derived NDVI product is available
at a spatial and temporal resolution of 1km and 16 days, respectively.
Experiment |
Grids |
Grid Configuration |
RC1, RC2 |
G1, G2 |
G1:
50X50, ? =
40km
G2: 122X122, ? = 10km
G3: 178X178, ? = 2.5km
G4: 146X162, ? = 0.625km |
LCA1, LCA2,
LCJ1, LCJ2 |
G1, G2, G3 |
Specific cases |
G1, G2, G3, G4 |
Table
1. Configuration of the grids used in the numerical modeling
experiments
In
the RC1 simulation we will use the standard database associated
with RAMS to assign the vegetation type and use MODIS products
described above to specify the vegetation characteristics. For
the RC2 simulation we will assume that all the areas currently
under cultivation were covered by native vegetation. In
the RC2 simulation, vegetation characteristics (LAI, fractional
vegetation cover, etc) over regions that are currently croplands
will be assigned values in a manner yields spatial distribution
is statistically similar to the undisturbed native vegetation
area. We
will do this by specifying values of vegetation characteristics
at the locations in the agricultural areas with corresponding
values from randomly chosen spots in the undisturbed native
vegetation areas.
MODIS retrieved seasonal variation of average surface energy
fluxes for native vegetation and agricultural areas will
be compared to corresponding model simulated values for current
land use conditions. We
will use this comparison to evaluate the ability of RAMS to properly
simulate the land surface processes in this region. In addition
to comparison with actual observations, the average values of spatial
distribution of precipitation in the regional climate simulation
for present land use will be compared against that for the pristine
land use scenario. We will use the criterion used by Allen
(1981) to detect the occurrence of low level jets in RC1 and RC2
simulations and compare the spatial distribution, frequency of
occurrence and intensity of low level jets. In addition we
will use analysis similar to those used in studies of general circulation
of the atmosphere (Piexoto and Oort, 1992) to examine differences
in regional circulation resulting from land use changes. In
this type of analysis averaging in time and space are used to separate
atmospheric variables into mean and perturbations arising from
various phenomenon which are usually referred to as eddy components
(stationary, transient, etc.). We will use information related
to stationary eddies, which are associated with land surface heterogeneity,
topography, monsoons, etc., to analyze differences in circulation
patterns between simulations RC1 and RC2. Another issue that
will be examined is the differences in atmospheric profiles in
grid 2 of RC1 and RC2 simulations when averaged over an area approximately
the size of a GCM grid box. We will use such a comparison
to infer the effect of land surface heterogeneity at scales
used in GCM simulations.
<--top
In
this set of simulations, we will use a grid with 3km spacing
straddling the bunny fence to examine cloud formation along the
border region between areas of contrasting land use. Configuration
and locations of grids to be used in these simulations are given
in Table 1 and Figure 10. We will use a procedure similar
to that used for simulations RC1 and RC2 utilizing MODIS data to
specify current and pristine land use scenarios. NCEP reanalysis
data along with radiosonde observations will be utilized for initializing
and forcing the lateral boundaries. Explicit representation
of cloud microphysics will be used to simulate cloud formation
for the months of August (LCA1, LCA2: current and pristine scenarios)
and January (LCJ1, LCJ2). In these simulations MODIS derived fractional
soil moisture will be used to nudge the evolution of surface soil
moisture distribution to be consistent with satellite observations.
These simulations will be analyzed to determine differences in
cloud cover, timing of convection, location of cloud formation,
cloud thickness, cloud top and base heights, cloud liquid water
content and cloud liquid water path. The model simulations
for the current land use scenario will be compared to GMS observations
of cloud cover and cloud location and MODIS derived cloud liquid
water path of clouds forming on the either side of the bunny fence.
We
will use numerical modeling simulations with grid spacing less
than 1km to examine specific cases of cloud formation in the
bunny fence area. These simulations will focus on days for which
land surface characteristics may exert an exceptionally strong
influence on cloud formation. We will consider cases that
fall into one of the three categories identified in section 5.6. If
possible, the case study days will be selected to coincide with
the field campaigns during which radiosonde observations will be
available over adjacent regions on either side of the bunny fence. We
will examine the cloud formation for these selected days with both
current and pristine land use scenarios. We will use a strategy
similar to the ones used in simulations described in the previous
sections to specify land surface characteristics for current and
pristine land use scenarios. We will use ASTER imagery to
specify soil moisture variability at smaller scales to be used
in these simulations. Explicit representation of cloud microphysics
will be used in these simulations.
These higher spatial resolution simulations incorporating both
satellite and ground based observations will be used explore if
the nature of land use and landscape heterogeneity is responsible
for preferential cloud formation and triggering of convection along
the bunny fence. If they do play an important role, then we will
examine the processes though which land use and landscape heterogeneity
interact with the formation of convective clouds. Also we
expect these simulations to help us understand environmental conditions
under which land use and landscape heterogeneity effects have a
significant impact on atmospheric processes. This knowledge will
help us estimate the frequency of occurrence of such environmental
conditions and thus evaluate the importance of land surface heterogeneity
effects on atmospheric convection.
<--top |